The case turns on the definition of a
single word – “supervisor” – under a federal civil rights law that
prohibits racial, religious or sexual harassment in the workplace.
Under previous Supreme Court rulings, an
employer is automatically responsible if a supervisor harasses a
subordinate. The employer is not liable if the harassment is between two
equal coworkers, unless it was negligent in allowing the abuse.
Since those rulings, a rift has developed
between federal appeals courts over exactly who is a supervisor. On one
side, three circuits say supervisors are those with the power to hire,
fire, demote, promote or discipline. Three other circuits have adopted a
broader standard, one that also includes employees who direct and
oversee a colleague’s daily work.
To continue reading, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment